i am completely sucked into the revised manifesto. first, it is aesthetically pleasing. second, it reflects your illustration style.
third, i am, after 10 hard minutes, still trying to figure it out: 1st, i began to draw on it as a maze. second, i pulled out all of the number letter combinations. third, i pulled out familiar symbols. fourth: i am still looking at the details. . . trying to find a clue.
however, i don't believe that i was supposed to do any of those things with this. to draw conclusions from your first manifesto, i am now thinking about conclusions: both modest and modestly revised. :o) now, this conclusion is something that i can understand. --- but that is solely due to the fact that i have examined our previous manifesto.
if i were to see this for the very first time, knowing absolutely nothing of its predecessor, i would probably repeat steps 1 through 4 each day.
i think that this is fantastic if this is the reaction that you wish to assume. -- subjecting your audience to constant scrutiny of what may only be a series of letters and numbers arranged to allow for one to draw their own conclusions.
. . . .
alright, i could ramble--- but it will be the same circle; so . . . am i even remotely close?
1 comment:
alright tramposh, here goes:
i am completely sucked into the revised manifesto. first, it is aesthetically pleasing. second, it reflects your illustration style.
third, i am, after 10 hard minutes, still trying to figure it out: 1st, i began to draw on it as a maze. second, i pulled out all of the number letter combinations. third, i pulled out familiar symbols.
fourth: i am still looking at the details. . . trying to find a clue.
however, i don't believe that i was supposed to do any of those things with this. to draw conclusions from your first manifesto, i am now thinking about conclusions: both modest and modestly revised. :o)
now, this conclusion is something that i can understand. --- but that is solely due to the fact that i have examined our previous manifesto.
if i were to see this for the very first time, knowing absolutely nothing of its predecessor, i would probably repeat steps 1 through 4 each day.
i think that this is fantastic if this is the reaction that you wish to assume. -- subjecting your audience to constant scrutiny of what may only be a series of letters and numbers arranged to allow for one to draw their own conclusions.
. . . .
alright, i could ramble--- but it will be the same circle; so . . . am i even remotely close?
:o\
Post a Comment